I'm still doing much needed research for my upcoming practice novel, as first explained here, when it dawned on me today that I'm having way too much fun with this. Being knee-deep in old Eastern European politics and historical documents and maps is made all the more exciting, it seems, when doing it for one's own edification.
I know: no DUH, right?
I find myself asking: why couldn't you be this studious and dedicated back in college? I mean, don't get me wrong, I paid my fair dues putting in the countless hours of necessary research, photocopying, hilighting, and indexing and all that jazz. But always with a begrudging sense of injustice at the unfairness of the universe. Real "whoa is me!" despair, I'm talking. For me, research was always a painful chore I endured to turn in a grade-A paper. Or, at least, a solid B or B+ (never got anything below a B-).
But this, this is something different. This is research on a writing project I choose to inflict on myself, covering a subject I'm genuinely interested in. It's all about me wanting to tell the best story I possibly can, in a setting as well-informed as can be managed without sacrificing all the hallmarks of engaging fiction that one must keep in mind.
So, I'm reading various different sources about the real historical Vlad the Impaler and the political climate around Europe during his time . . . and it's become a natural thing for me to catalogue and index all the fun, helpful facts I'm coming across.
Imagine that? I'll make me a serious researcher yet!
It's all about the proper motivation. What is droll and life-draining during formal education becomes engaging and thought-provoking when undertaken under one's own impetus, time, and direction. There's a lesson here somewhere, and I'm just too lazy to think it all the way through.
I guess I'm saying that school is all well and good for obtaining a piece of paper that legitimizes your place as a working cog in the society machine, but that actual self-enlightenment is the true reward.
Knowledge sought freely, rather than forced upon the receiver, evolves into wisdom everlasting.
Sorry, I know I just went all Hallmark-y on you readers. It won't happen [much] again. Promise.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Saturday, November 7, 2009
New Game In Time For The Holidays
Those of you not in the know regarding the gaming industry, October to January marks the annual blitz of top-notch, triple-A games rushing the market ahead of the Christmas buying season to sap gamers (and their parents) of all their well-earned cash. Much like the film industry, most of the best games of the year come out during this 3-month window. And of course, what would the holiday game season be without a little controversy from watchdog groups and the media who don't know shit about what they're talking about?
This year's candidate to the media shit storm is the soon to be released Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, a sequel to 2007's monumental hit. The game is a first-person military action shooter taking place in the modern day arena, whereby American marines and British special forces team up along with the Russian militia to eliminate a shared terrorist threat against the world. The game employs ultra-realistic visuals, tactics, and actual military ordinance to provide gamers a detailed experience of fighting in an elite anti-terrorist unit. To me, it feels more like the tv show "24" in terms of the plotting and all the attendant twists and turns that go along with the story.
The real controversy, however, surrounds one particular mission where the playable character infiltrates one of the terrorist's cells and masquerades undercover in order to get closer to the leader. The mission where he gains the leader's trust centers on an airport in Moscow, during which the player is asked to participate in a pretty horrific and brutal widescale slaughter of innocents and security personnel alike. The scene is so graphic and realistic that many are condemning the entire game as being insensitive towards families of victims of terrorists acts like 9/11 and the Madrid and London train bombings.
I, of course, say it's just a game. And it's not like the mission takes place in a train station or onboard an American airplane headed for a city skyscraper. The game is about stopping terrorists, not glorifying them. And, I'm sorry, but terrorists do bad things. It's right there in the name: "terrorist."
Anyway, to read more about the issue, check out this CTV article here. And, if you somehow want to see the mission in question yourself, I was able to find a video clip of it online. I'm only linking to it due to the controversial nature of the footage. And I must first warn you that it contains very raw and graphics scenes of innocent people being gunned down. Normally I wouldn't link to this, but I think it's important to see what the controversy is about first-hand and judge for yourself. So, if you're up to it, click on this link. The footage starts at the beginning of the mission, which is a debriefing. Eventually, however, the gameplay takes over as the player and the terrorist cell he's infiltrated arrive on the scene via an airport security elevator.
Personally, since I am an adult gamer, and seeing as how this game is already rated M for "mature," I don't see the problem. I prefer games with a mature, gritty outlook on life because let's face it: the world is a gruesome place. M-rated games are meant to be sold only to those who are 17 or older. Official chain stores like Gamestop and EBgames *always* check ID in this country nowadays. But of course there are still ways of getting around it. My point is, parents should be the ones in control of what their kids play. The game makers' only responsibility is to label the packaging accordingly and trust to the ESRB ratings board to do its job and assign it the proper age-restricted grade. After that, the onus falls on parents to make sure their under 17 kids don't go anywhere near the game.
That being said: I got the game as soon as I could! What, you thought I wouldn't? Yes, the game doesn't officially come out until next Tuesday, Nov. 10. But I have my sources, LOL! I've been sitting on the title for the past two days now, only playing the first two missions, but from what I can tell this is going to be an epic fun experience. I'll update my sidebar eventually so you can track my progress.
The funny thing is, when you first start up the game, you're greeted with the following two messages, which I took directly off the tv screen with my iPhone camera:
This year's candidate to the media shit storm is the soon to be released Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, a sequel to 2007's monumental hit. The game is a first-person military action shooter taking place in the modern day arena, whereby American marines and British special forces team up along with the Russian militia to eliminate a shared terrorist threat against the world. The game employs ultra-realistic visuals, tactics, and actual military ordinance to provide gamers a detailed experience of fighting in an elite anti-terrorist unit. To me, it feels more like the tv show "24" in terms of the plotting and all the attendant twists and turns that go along with the story.
The real controversy, however, surrounds one particular mission where the playable character infiltrates one of the terrorist's cells and masquerades undercover in order to get closer to the leader. The mission where he gains the leader's trust centers on an airport in Moscow, during which the player is asked to participate in a pretty horrific and brutal widescale slaughter of innocents and security personnel alike. The scene is so graphic and realistic that many are condemning the entire game as being insensitive towards families of victims of terrorists acts like 9/11 and the Madrid and London train bombings.
I, of course, say it's just a game. And it's not like the mission takes place in a train station or onboard an American airplane headed for a city skyscraper. The game is about stopping terrorists, not glorifying them. And, I'm sorry, but terrorists do bad things. It's right there in the name: "terrorist."
Anyway, to read more about the issue, check out this CTV article here. And, if you somehow want to see the mission in question yourself, I was able to find a video clip of it online. I'm only linking to it due to the controversial nature of the footage. And I must first warn you that it contains very raw and graphics scenes of innocent people being gunned down. Normally I wouldn't link to this, but I think it's important to see what the controversy is about first-hand and judge for yourself. So, if you're up to it, click on this link. The footage starts at the beginning of the mission, which is a debriefing. Eventually, however, the gameplay takes over as the player and the terrorist cell he's infiltrated arrive on the scene via an airport security elevator.
Personally, since I am an adult gamer, and seeing as how this game is already rated M for "mature," I don't see the problem. I prefer games with a mature, gritty outlook on life because let's face it: the world is a gruesome place. M-rated games are meant to be sold only to those who are 17 or older. Official chain stores like Gamestop and EBgames *always* check ID in this country nowadays. But of course there are still ways of getting around it. My point is, parents should be the ones in control of what their kids play. The game makers' only responsibility is to label the packaging accordingly and trust to the ESRB ratings board to do its job and assign it the proper age-restricted grade. After that, the onus falls on parents to make sure their under 17 kids don't go anywhere near the game.
That being said: I got the game as soon as I could! What, you thought I wouldn't? Yes, the game doesn't officially come out until next Tuesday, Nov. 10. But I have my sources, LOL! I've been sitting on the title for the past two days now, only playing the first two missions, but from what I can tell this is going to be an epic fun experience. I'll update my sidebar eventually so you can track my progress.
The funny thing is, when you first start up the game, you're greeted with the following two messages, which I took directly off the tv screen with my iPhone camera:
I think this is very responsible of the game makers, don't you? I mean, of course no kid in their right mind would skip the mission even given the opportunity, but for those gamers who actually shy away from this kind of graphic killing of innocents (and believe me, there are a surprising number of such people, as you can see by perusing some of the gaming message boards), it's nice that we're given the option to skip the mission. I won't, but that's just me.
I'm going to head back into the game now. For those waiting until next week to purchase this, or if you just want a safe, innocuous peek at the game with no moralistic baggage attached, check out the embedded video file below for the most recent official tv trailer. At the very least, you'll be able to see how amazing the graphics look, and how much good military action is packed into this game. Will it be Game of the Year? Some think so. I'm not so sure.
A Dragon, A Nurse, And A Pumpkin . . .
What do all three have in common?
Well nothing, really. Except when they're costumes being worn by three of the most adorable, precious niece and nephews on the whole planet!
I know I'm late on the Halloween pics, but I finally got these forwarded to me by my sister in-law via her camera phone:
Well nothing, really. Except when they're costumes being worn by three of the most adorable, precious niece and nephews on the whole planet!
I know I'm late on the Halloween pics, but I finally got these forwarded to me by my sister in-law via her camera phone:
In order they are: Chandler the dragon (2 yrs old); Ariana the nurse (1 yr old); and the baby of the bunch, Brandon the pumpkin. Poor little Brandon looks like he's being disturbed from his all important midday nap -- UH OH!!!
Seriously, though, could you deny these faces some candy? I dare proclaim: YOU CAN NOT!!!
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
A Promising Start
A while back I blogged here about the revamping of the 80s primetime sci-fi series, V. Well, last night the pilot showed on ABC, part of a 4-episode airing in the month of November before the show gets put on hiatus until next Spring.
There's a lot of bemoaning going on about the show rushing some plot lines that, in the original mini-series, were allowed a little bit more time to play out. I'm not going to give anything away, but fans of the original know of several key payoff moments I might be talking about.
My thing is: big deal! Most of us already know these details, so the sooner they get them out of the way the better. Yes, it does seem odd that humans on Earth react too swiftly and with open arms to the arrival of the "Visitors." You'd expect a lot more cynicism in this day and age of foreign fear-mongering and looming terrorist attacks and what-not. You'd also expect a populace that's grown up on alien invasion films to run screaming when the giant, round spaceships show up out of nowhere and hover just above the skyline of all the major cities of the world.
And yes, all of this did hit a sour note with me. But I went with it and actually ended up enjoying this 1-hour pilot. Especially the latter half when we learn something interesting that serves as a departure from the original series.
Morena Baccarin is as lovely as ever, even more so with short hair this time. And right now she's playing the role of the Visitor's leader, Anna, very well. Dark and seductive with just a hint of something menacing lurking beneath the surface. I'm waiting until we see her "true" nature revealed.
V is off to a great start, folks. Color me surprised. While some of the "personal" moments of the show are over done and quite annoying (like the relationship between the FBI agent and her truant teenage son), it's not that far of a departure from what was in the old show to really be worth complaining about.
In any event, I'll be there next week and hope the ratings hold up. My Tivo's all set to record!
Hey, Nice!
Bonnie Norman over at her blog, A Working Title, has an interview up with one of my favorite sci-fi writers, Tobias Buckell. Check it out here.
I loved how he explained learning to write a book by dissecting and mapping out Vernor Vinge's seminal novel, A Fire Upon the Deep, chapter by chapter. That's something I've been meaning to do with some of my favorite books. Hmmm.
Even more interesting is the discussion over non-Caucasians being represented in today's SF -- or lack thereof:
Read the interview for more.
I loved how he explained learning to write a book by dissecting and mapping out Vernor Vinge's seminal novel, A Fire Upon the Deep, chapter by chapter. That's something I've been meaning to do with some of my favorite books. Hmmm.
Even more interesting is the discussion over non-Caucasians being represented in today's SF -- or lack thereof:
"Q11: Do you think that the fact that Crystal Rain features an overwhelming array of characters of color, including the main character, affected how quickly the book was picked up?
TB: Hard to say. On one hand, it got a lot of rejections, but they didn’t specify why. One house said it was confusing because I was white-looking, but the people in the book were all minorities, and they weren’t sure how to sell that. I know it’s affected some sales, some have emailed me hate mail based on the idea that Caribbean peoples would rule the stars. But on the other hand, I’m still plugging away selling books and gaining readers, so it’s not a show-stopper. Some people are just never going to be your audience."
Read the interview for more.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
I Hope This Movie Bombs Horrifically!
I can't believe the amount of hatred I can have for one movie based solely on the trailers, but Roland Emmerich's latest shitfest really takes the cake! I mean, disregarding the whole stupid bullshit behind the so-called "year 2012" Mayan calendar prediction (which, btw, real living Mayan descendants today know nothing about), this is a bad movie just on principle.
The Australian division of Ign.com has just released an early review of the film, and I'm happy to see I'm not the only one that agrees it's one of the silliest movies this side of The Day After Tomorrow. Which, not coincidentally, is also a Roland Emmerich shitfest. See the pattern, anyone? If you want to read the review, click here.
Honestly, I'm not surprised. Everything the reviewer complains about is exactly what I took from just watching the trailer. The first time I saw this in the theaters, my mouth literally hung open in shock. I could not believe the sheer amount of DUMB being hurled my way. It was so embarrassing that other people in the theater were shaking their heads and chuckling. It's like watching the payoff moment at the end of Speed . . . playing over and over and over again. Is this all that the movie is going to be? Because it sure looks like it.
Check out the trailer below. I'm linking to it because I just don't want to waste good bandwidth embedding this piece of shit. But don't take my word for it. If you can stomach the sheer stupid, click and ye shall be enlightened:
The film has an estimated budget somewhere north of the $200 mil mark. GAH! I want this thing to bomb so badly that Hollywood will never ever think of letting Roland Emmerich near another film set ever again. I mean, yeah he brought us Stargate and Independence Day--both on my top 20 list of favorite movies of all time--but everything else has been downhill since then.
This movie needs to die, and die horribly. 'Nuff said.
Monday, November 2, 2009
Hilarity Ensues . . .
Last night's World Series game proved rather LOL-worthy, I must say. Especially this one play by the Yankees' Johnny Damon, who took advantage of the Phillies' defense abandoning 3rd base to steal it by way of 2nd base from 1st. Confused yet? You have to see it for yourself:
The play goes down in the history books as the first time any player has ever stolen 2 bases on 1 pitch during the World Series.
What were the Phillies thinking? It hurts even more that, because of this one gaffe, the Yanks ended up taking advantage of the pitcher, Lidge, and going on to take the lead for good that night.
Well, it hurts for Phillies fans, I should say. (haha!)
As a Yankee fan, I'm in the envious catch-22 position of wanting my team to close out this series as fast as possible (tonight), but at the same time desiring that they close it out at home (Wednesday night). Honestly, either one will do at this point. If they do it on the road, we'll have a great parade down the Canyon of Heroes in which to celebrate! Since I work right smack dab in the middle of said Canyon, this will be quite an enjoyable experience for me this year if they pull it off.
LET'S GO YANKEES!!!
The play goes down in the history books as the first time any player has ever stolen 2 bases on 1 pitch during the World Series.
What were the Phillies thinking? It hurts even more that, because of this one gaffe, the Yanks ended up taking advantage of the pitcher, Lidge, and going on to take the lead for good that night.
Well, it hurts for Phillies fans, I should say. (haha!)
As a Yankee fan, I'm in the envious catch-22 position of wanting my team to close out this series as fast as possible (tonight), but at the same time desiring that they close it out at home (Wednesday night). Honestly, either one will do at this point. If they do it on the road, we'll have a great parade down the Canyon of Heroes in which to celebrate! Since I work right smack dab in the middle of said Canyon, this will be quite an enjoyable experience for me this year if they pull it off.
LET'S GO YANKEES!!!
Saturday, October 31, 2009
New Avatar Trailer
The second official trailer for the James Cameron sci-fi opus, Avatar, has been garnering more buzz over the past couple of days. You may remember me talking about this upcoming December-release a while back. If not, click here and also here for a refresher. Needless to say, I'm so ready to see this movie!
The new trailer is hard to come by, but I was able to find one up at Youtube.com for the time being (who knows how long that will stay up). Click on the video player below to watch:
Now I know a lot of people hear buzz over a movie and immediately turn into "buzz kill" just out of spite, so I'm not going to say anything about expectations or what-not. I'll just say that, from watching this trailer for like the 5th time now, and trying to analyze as much as I could from it . . . yeah, I think it might just rock my world! :)
From what I can see so far, it appears to have a pretty rockin story to go along with all the visuals. And that's what I care about the most.
I hope Cameron can spin lead into box office gold once more.
The new trailer is hard to come by, but I was able to find one up at Youtube.com for the time being (who knows how long that will stay up). Click on the video player below to watch:
Now I know a lot of people hear buzz over a movie and immediately turn into "buzz kill" just out of spite, so I'm not going to say anything about expectations or what-not. I'll just say that, from watching this trailer for like the 5th time now, and trying to analyze as much as I could from it . . . yeah, I think it might just rock my world! :)
From what I can see so far, it appears to have a pretty rockin story to go along with all the visuals. And that's what I care about the most.
I hope Cameron can spin lead into box office gold once more.
These 'Dos Equis' Spots Own My Funnybone!
The Dos Equis beer ads have been hitting the national airwaves as of late, although I've known about them for almost a year going now. They feature the fictional "Most Interesting Man in the World" and are damn HILARIOUS! The 30-second tv spots are made all the more interesting because they use vintage stock footage from random tv shows and movies the actor has starred in. Seriously, check one of them out:
Ha-ha! "Stay thirsty my friends." I love it!
This guy just oozes cool. He's portrayed by one Jonathan Goldsmith who, according to his IMDB.com profile, is a C-list actor who's been a guest character on pretty much all the cool 80s shows back in the day. This must be why he looks and sounds so familiar to me, but couldn't quite place where I knew him from.
For those not in the know, these ads are done in the same humor as the wildly popular Chuck Norris joke meme that's been making the rounds in chain mails and message boards for several years now (some of which are gems, but most of which are not really humorous). These Dos Equis commercials are way funnier, in my opinion. I only wish I could find which movies and/or tv shows some of these scenes were taken from. They look mighty interesting, no?
Well here are a few more commercials to judge by. I'm going to be linking to them rather than embedding the full video since I don't want to freeze up my load bandwidth.
Click on each one. Trust me, you will laugh at the outrageousness of some of the claims attributed to this dude. :)
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Prepositions
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- The Police
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Cures Narcolepsy
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Credit Cards
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Careers
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Rollerblading
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Pick-Up Lines
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Packages
I can't get enough of these, but I'll stop here. I even like the music being used. If only I could find out where it's from. Anyone know?
"I don't always drink beer. But when I do, I prefer 'Dos Equis'."
I think I'm going to have to try a bottle the next time I go out for drinks. Now that's good advertising, folks, if it can get me to drink beer!
Ha-ha! "Stay thirsty my friends." I love it!
This guy just oozes cool. He's portrayed by one Jonathan Goldsmith who, according to his IMDB.com profile, is a C-list actor who's been a guest character on pretty much all the cool 80s shows back in the day. This must be why he looks and sounds so familiar to me, but couldn't quite place where I knew him from.
For those not in the know, these ads are done in the same humor as the wildly popular Chuck Norris joke meme that's been making the rounds in chain mails and message boards for several years now (some of which are gems, but most of which are not really humorous). These Dos Equis commercials are way funnier, in my opinion. I only wish I could find which movies and/or tv shows some of these scenes were taken from. They look mighty interesting, no?
Well here are a few more commercials to judge by. I'm going to be linking to them rather than embedding the full video since I don't want to freeze up my load bandwidth.
Click on each one. Trust me, you will laugh at the outrageousness of some of the claims attributed to this dude. :)
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Prepositions
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- The Police
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Cures Narcolepsy
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- Credit Cards
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Careers
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Rollerblading
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Pick-Up Lines
The Most Interesting Man In the World -- on Packages
I can't get enough of these, but I'll stop here. I even like the music being used. If only I could find out where it's from. Anyone know?
"I don't always drink beer. But when I do, I prefer 'Dos Equis'."
I think I'm going to have to try a bottle the next time I go out for drinks. Now that's good advertising, folks, if it can get me to drink beer!
Friday, October 30, 2009
Another Blog Added
A good friend of mine from college just joined the blog craze, and I wanted to pimp his site a little to all my friends. Peeps, Rodney Lopez. Rodney Lopez, peeps. You can find a link to his blog in my "Interesting Folks" sidebar on the right-hand side of this page. Or, you know, you can just click right here.
I met Rodney on my very first day at Middlebury College, a little over 15 years ago. We ended up being floormates our Freshmen year, and then dorm mates at another building the year after. Although we debated and argued over a lot of stuff during those 4 years, he's a cool dude and gets much respect from me. He's also heavily into all things speculative like yours truly, and is a gamer too! Yes, it's not hard to see how we became friends.
So welcome to this crazy world of blogging, Rod! Seems tailor-made for you. What kept ya?
I met Rodney on my very first day at Middlebury College, a little over 15 years ago. We ended up being floormates our Freshmen year, and then dorm mates at another building the year after. Although we debated and argued over a lot of stuff during those 4 years, he's a cool dude and gets much respect from me. He's also heavily into all things speculative like yours truly, and is a gamer too! Yes, it's not hard to see how we became friends.
So welcome to this crazy world of blogging, Rod! Seems tailor-made for you. What kept ya?
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Son Of A---!
So I'm still researching for my upcoming "pretend" novel, as first mentioned here, when lo and behold a new idea for a short story pops into my head. Great, just what I don't need! I had specifically told myself not to do this. Put all short stories aside for the time being, I said. We need all the brain cells we can spare for the BIG daddy of projects.
But apparently my subconscious didn't get the memo between me and myself. I had the weirdest dream this morning, full of confusing imagery and suggestive themes. So, of course, my dreaming self thought: Hey, wake up! This would make a great story! And when I woke up, the sane side of me had to actually agree.
And so here I am. Because I couldn't get the really cool idea out of my head while I showered, I quickly hopped on the PC and wrote out the very first scene before work. It turned out pretty good. I just finished writing the second scene a little while ago, and now I'm well on my way.
So, the bad news is that my novelization is put on hold momentarily. The good news is, I'm still writing. Since this is only a short story, it will be over shortly (heh, heh--get it?). And then I can get back to this business of writing my book.
I can think of worst ways to be interrupted.
But apparently my subconscious didn't get the memo between me and myself. I had the weirdest dream this morning, full of confusing imagery and suggestive themes. So, of course, my dreaming self thought: Hey, wake up! This would make a great story! And when I woke up, the sane side of me had to actually agree.
And so here I am. Because I couldn't get the really cool idea out of my head while I showered, I quickly hopped on the PC and wrote out the very first scene before work. It turned out pretty good. I just finished writing the second scene a little while ago, and now I'm well on my way.
So, the bad news is that my novelization is put on hold momentarily. The good news is, I'm still writing. Since this is only a short story, it will be over shortly (heh, heh--get it?). And then I can get back to this business of writing my book.
I can think of worst ways to be interrupted.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Darn Movie Trailer Almost Made Me Cry!
We went to check out Where The Wild Things Are and Law Abiding Citizen at the Kip's Bay multiplex this morning, and this trailer for a new movie called The Blind Side was playing before the latter:
I mean, I know the movie is intentionally trying to pluck the heartstrings here . . . but I just can't help it! From the trailer alone I was so very moved, which of course makes me really want to see the whole movie. I love that it's based on a true story, too, and that Sandra Bullock is in a non-comedic role. Way to go!
The Blind Side is based on the book by the same name, and tells the real life story of Michael Oher, who was drafted into the Baltimore Ravens as the team's RT (right tackle) earlier this year.
My only fear is that this might turn out like last year's Will Smith starrer, Seven Pounds, which was also based on a true story but was way too saccharine for my tastes. I mean, I could actually feel myself as an audience member being emotionally manipulated. Never a good thing. Jamie Foxx's The Soloist was the same way, too.
So yeah, this is looking very good. But I hope it doesn't turn out like those two movies.
What's your opinion from watching the trailer?
I mean, I know the movie is intentionally trying to pluck the heartstrings here . . . but I just can't help it! From the trailer alone I was so very moved, which of course makes me really want to see the whole movie. I love that it's based on a true story, too, and that Sandra Bullock is in a non-comedic role. Way to go!
The Blind Side is based on the book by the same name, and tells the real life story of Michael Oher, who was drafted into the Baltimore Ravens as the team's RT (right tackle) earlier this year.
My only fear is that this might turn out like last year's Will Smith starrer, Seven Pounds, which was also based on a true story but was way too saccharine for my tastes. I mean, I could actually feel myself as an audience member being emotionally manipulated. Never a good thing. Jamie Foxx's The Soloist was the same way, too.
So yeah, this is looking very good. But I hope it doesn't turn out like those two movies.
What's your opinion from watching the trailer?
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Top Nintendo Games Of All Time!
IGN.com recently put out a list of the Top 100 NES Games Of All Time. Click on the link and see for yourself what was chosen. Mind you, these are just the 8-bit games, most of which were released between the mid 80s through the very early 90s. Eventually the "Super" Nintendo would come out in the summer of '91 and, of course, open a whole 'nother can of whoop-ass on the gaming world. But that's a whole other list best saved for the future, I guess.
It's surprising how many of these games I've played and beaten. Out of 100, I've logged in the hours (nay, WEEKS!) on 54 of them. Yes, I counted. Twice. I culled a list from the list of all the ones I've played. Most I've owned, some I borrowed, and the others I rented. But all of them would witness defeat at the hands of me and my younger brother back in the day.
FUN!!!
Ice Hockey
Rush'n Attack
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Astyanax
Mega Man 4
Kickle Cubicle
Mario Bros.
Duck Hunt
Spy Hunter
Chip'n Dale: Rescue Rangers
Tecmo World Wrestling
Little Nemo: The Dream Master
Kung Fu
Super C
Rygar
Rad Racer
Ghosts'n Goblins
Tecmo Super Bowl
Dr. Mario
Tetris
Fester's Quest
Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Arcade Game
Battletoads
Gradius
Batman: The Video Game
Mega Man
Kirby's Adventure
Metal Gear
Castlevania II: Simon's Quest
Blades of Steel
Bubble Bobble
Blaster Master
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Kid Icarus
Castlevania
Super Mario Bros. 2
Ninja Gaiden
Mega Man 3
River City Ransom
Excitebike
R.C. Pro-Am
Contra
Final Fantasy
Duck Tales
Bionic Commando
Dragon Warrior
Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!
Metroid
Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse
Mega Man 2
Super Mario Bros.
The Legend of Zelda
Super Mario Bros. 3
Personally, Ninja Gaiden would be my No. 1. But I think you already knew that. :)
It's surprising how many of these games I've played and beaten. Out of 100, I've logged in the hours (nay, WEEKS!) on 54 of them. Yes, I counted. Twice. I culled a list from the list of all the ones I've played. Most I've owned, some I borrowed, and the others I rented. But all of them would witness defeat at the hands of me and my younger brother back in the day.
FUN!!!
Ice Hockey
Rush'n Attack
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Astyanax
Mega Man 4
Kickle Cubicle
Mario Bros.
Duck Hunt
Spy Hunter
Chip'n Dale: Rescue Rangers
Tecmo World Wrestling
Little Nemo: The Dream Master
Kung Fu
Super C
Rygar
Rad Racer
Ghosts'n Goblins
Tecmo Super Bowl
Dr. Mario
Tetris
Fester's Quest
Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Arcade Game
Battletoads
Gradius
Batman: The Video Game
Mega Man
Kirby's Adventure
Metal Gear
Castlevania II: Simon's Quest
Blades of Steel
Bubble Bobble
Blaster Master
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Kid Icarus
Castlevania
Super Mario Bros. 2
Ninja Gaiden
Mega Man 3
River City Ransom
Excitebike
R.C. Pro-Am
Contra
Final Fantasy
Duck Tales
Bionic Commando
Dragon Warrior
Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!
Metroid
Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse
Mega Man 2
Super Mario Bros.
The Legend of Zelda
Super Mario Bros. 3
Personally, Ninja Gaiden would be my No. 1. But I think you already knew that. :)
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Random Thought
Just thought I should clarify a generalization that's been bothering me. No one recent incident sprung this train of thought, but it occurred to me just a second ago that I should mention it anyway.
When I say a particular professional and published author is a "bad writer," it should be implicit that I do not consider myself a better writer than said author. See, I'm super critical and demanding with my own work. I know my flaws when I see them, and I know that I'm not at the stage yet to be called "good." Passing, maybe, but not good. But the published writer *is* better than me simply by virtue of being published in a professional market and/or capacity.
That being said, I reserve the right to say an author's command of the written word needs work without it implying somehow that I, David Batista, am any better. For instance, I can say that Dan Brown's writing style is very simplistic and a little wonky at times, but that he's a masterful storyteller. A true genius at the craft, in fact.
See what I did there?
Dan Brown's actual writing is very low-brow and appealing to the lowest common denominator, but the way he spins a story is purely out of this world. A true writer has to balance the two. He has to be passable enough with the mechanics of writing so that a wide array of readers with various educational backgrounds and reading proficiencies can literally read what he's writing, but also has to know how to tell a good yarn to keep them turning the page. Just because you can do one does equate to expertise with the other.
Now, to be clear here: Dan Brown is a far better writer than I am. But even more importantly, he's a superbly gifted story teller. I can practice and practice and practice to improve the former, but the latter takes a special touch that really no one can teach you.
So, again: When I say a particular author or screenwriter can't write to save his ass, it does not necessarily mean that he can't tell a good story. Just look at George Lucas if you want any better proof of this. The man can spin a beautiful fantasy premise -- but for the love of god, don't let him near a typewriter!
And when I say a particular novel should have been better written, it does not mean that I can write it better.
Hope that clears the air some.
When I say a particular professional and published author is a "bad writer," it should be implicit that I do not consider myself a better writer than said author. See, I'm super critical and demanding with my own work. I know my flaws when I see them, and I know that I'm not at the stage yet to be called "good." Passing, maybe, but not good. But the published writer *is* better than me simply by virtue of being published in a professional market and/or capacity.
That being said, I reserve the right to say an author's command of the written word needs work without it implying somehow that I, David Batista, am any better. For instance, I can say that Dan Brown's writing style is very simplistic and a little wonky at times, but that he's a masterful storyteller. A true genius at the craft, in fact.
See what I did there?
Dan Brown's actual writing is very low-brow and appealing to the lowest common denominator, but the way he spins a story is purely out of this world. A true writer has to balance the two. He has to be passable enough with the mechanics of writing so that a wide array of readers with various educational backgrounds and reading proficiencies can literally read what he's writing, but also has to know how to tell a good yarn to keep them turning the page. Just because you can do one does equate to expertise with the other.
Now, to be clear here: Dan Brown is a far better writer than I am. But even more importantly, he's a superbly gifted story teller. I can practice and practice and practice to improve the former, but the latter takes a special touch that really no one can teach you.
So, again: When I say a particular author or screenwriter can't write to save his ass, it does not necessarily mean that he can't tell a good story. Just look at George Lucas if you want any better proof of this. The man can spin a beautiful fantasy premise -- but for the love of god, don't let him near a typewriter!
And when I say a particular novel should have been better written, it does not mean that I can write it better.
Hope that clears the air some.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
My Trip To Corporate
I feel like a character from that NBC show, The Office. But yesterday I had to make a trip up to the Thomson Reuters headquarters in Times Square. The building I work at down in the Financial District is the old AT&T building. But for important company-wide meetings, we all head up to HQ on 42nd street.
Squeezed in there between the Chase bank building and the AT&T store is the entrance to Thomson Reuters. This used to be the Reuters building before they merged with us, Thomson Financial. I thought I took a clearer picture on my iPhone, but guess not. You can barely make out the corporate signage on the side of the entrance.
This was my first time in the building, and I have to say the interior is pretty sleek and modern, unlike our building downtown, which has a Greco-classical architectural theme replete with wide columns and vaulted ceilings. No, the inside of the Thomson Reuters building is like the interior of the Ugly Betty set--mirrors, lit glass panels, and large single-paned windows.
I didn't take any pictures of the interior, but I did take some of the breathtaking views from the 30th floor reception lounge:
All in all it was a mundane and superfluous meeting for managers. Since this is my first year in such capacity at my division, I took it very seriously. Too bad many others in attendance didn't seem to share the same respect. Honestly, WTF is up with all the Blackberry addiction running rampant? The guy sitting next to me would NOT stop texting during the entire meeting. Yes, it was a long 3 hours of sitting on hard chairs, but dayum! Put the crack-berry down, man!
Even worse was the way people started getting up and leaving near the tail end of the presentation. This is the period when the audience is allowed to ask questions. I'm sorry, but I think it's plain rude to just get up and walk out when your colleagues are in the middle of speaking. Luckily I wasn't one of the ones asking questions, or I would have stopped and told these people to sit the hell back down until I'm done. I felt bad for the presenters, who didn't quite seem to know what to make of the ruckus of so many people shuffling past and down the aisles at once.
And I have no idea where these people were rushing off too since we still had to head back to our offices and put in a half-day's work anyway. It's not as if we were being allowed to go home. Sheesh!
Anyway, that was my brief trip to corporate. I learned a lot about being an effective manager, and how to supervise certain situations that can arise within the workplace.
When I left the building and went to the nearest PAX Wholesome Foods for a sandwich, the cashier asked me if I worked in the vicinity so that she could apply a discount. I caught myself before I said "no" when I realized that--hey, yeah, I guess technically I *do* work around here. (heh, heh) Little did she know I would be heading straight for the subway after purchasing my sandwich and going downtown.
Squeezed in there between the Chase bank building and the AT&T store is the entrance to Thomson Reuters. This used to be the Reuters building before they merged with us, Thomson Financial. I thought I took a clearer picture on my iPhone, but guess not. You can barely make out the corporate signage on the side of the entrance.
This was my first time in the building, and I have to say the interior is pretty sleek and modern, unlike our building downtown, which has a Greco-classical architectural theme replete with wide columns and vaulted ceilings. No, the inside of the Thomson Reuters building is like the interior of the Ugly Betty set--mirrors, lit glass panels, and large single-paned windows.
I didn't take any pictures of the interior, but I did take some of the breathtaking views from the 30th floor reception lounge:
All in all it was a mundane and superfluous meeting for managers. Since this is my first year in such capacity at my division, I took it very seriously. Too bad many others in attendance didn't seem to share the same respect. Honestly, WTF is up with all the Blackberry addiction running rampant? The guy sitting next to me would NOT stop texting during the entire meeting. Yes, it was a long 3 hours of sitting on hard chairs, but dayum! Put the crack-berry down, man!
Even worse was the way people started getting up and leaving near the tail end of the presentation. This is the period when the audience is allowed to ask questions. I'm sorry, but I think it's plain rude to just get up and walk out when your colleagues are in the middle of speaking. Luckily I wasn't one of the ones asking questions, or I would have stopped and told these people to sit the hell back down until I'm done. I felt bad for the presenters, who didn't quite seem to know what to make of the ruckus of so many people shuffling past and down the aisles at once.
And I have no idea where these people were rushing off too since we still had to head back to our offices and put in a half-day's work anyway. It's not as if we were being allowed to go home. Sheesh!
Anyway, that was my brief trip to corporate. I learned a lot about being an effective manager, and how to supervise certain situations that can arise within the workplace.
When I left the building and went to the nearest PAX Wholesome Foods for a sandwich, the cashier asked me if I worked in the vicinity so that she could apply a discount. I caught myself before I said "no" when I realized that--hey, yeah, I guess technically I *do* work around here. (heh, heh) Little did she know I would be heading straight for the subway after purchasing my sandwich and going downtown.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
